Unanticipated Consequences and Guilt

And so in a minor way I was involved in the internet and computer animation.  To have killed off newspapers and drawn animation to have been participated in that in any way is a horrible sin I can not be forgiven for.

Mexican restaurant or Harvard?

This is a test of writing a blog post on my phone.

Jill and I ordered food late in Joshua tree from a 24-hour Mexican restaurant. Our hostess was a beautiful African American woman who reminded me of a famous actress seen in science fiction and superhero movies. But one of these went to Harvard and became an actress and the other is serving bean tostadas at midnight. It's not clear to me that this country provides opportunities to everybody. In fact it's very clear that it doesn't. This country is a disgrace.

Prohibited Terms in MidJourney and the Public Morality

Imagine the problem that Midjourney faces: to police the morals of millions of the worlds' citizens many of whom have very sick ideas of what they want to visualize.  So if it finds a term that is prohibited, it just stops you cold and gives you a button you can push if you dont like it.  Of course the button does nothing, but maybe it makes the user feel better.

I have innocently run into some of these, which I specify below as far as I remember.  I speculate there are others that we can imagine that are also on the prohibited list.

Terms I have tried that dont work: latex, spandex, nazi, national socialist, bloody, swastika

Terms I have not tried but probably dont work: anything involving explicit sex, blood, defecation, genocide.

The Black Flag of Vengeance Courtesy of MidJourney

 
Although MidJourney is clearly hit and miss, and can be frustrating, it can also be very productive.  Here are a few concept sketches of a black flag with daggers and stars.  Unspoken is the thought that this is a homage to the Wagner Group and their now deceased leader.

And these with more emphasis on the dagger element.

And a different design with a dagger

ChatGPT Release Forever of All Things

 
I offered to create a class picture of my high school reunion and was cautioned to be concerned about privacy rights.  Hence, I asked ChatGPT to write me a release to own everything someone might do, for all purposes, forever, in all media, without compensation.  I dont think this quite does that, but it is a fun first draft.

[Your Name/Your Organization]
[Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
[Subject's Name]
[Subject's Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]

RELEASE AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS

I, [Subject's Name], hereinafter referred to as the "Subject," hereby grant to [Your Name/Your Organization], hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient," and its legal representatives, successors, and assigns, the absolute and irrevocable right and permission to use, reproduce, distribute, display, and publish in any media, now known or hereafter devised, including but not limited to photographs, images, ideas, intellectual property, and any related materials (the "Materials") depicting or created by me.

I understand that the Materials may be used for various purposes, including but not limited to promotion, advertising, marketing, educational, and editorial purposes, without any further compensation to me. I waive any right to inspect or approve the final product wherein the Materials appear.

I hereby release, discharge, and hold harmless the Recipient, its agents, representatives, and all persons acting under its permission or authority from any liability related to the use of the Materials, including but not limited to any claims for libel, defamation, invasion of privacy, or infringement of copyright.

I affirm that I am the sole owner of any intellectual property rights associated with the Materials and that I have the legal right to grant the permissions and rights outlined in this release. I agree that this release is binding upon me, my heirs, legal representatives, and assigns.

This release shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the [Your State/Country]. Any disputes arising out of this release shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in [Your City/County].

I have read and understood this release before signing it and hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy for my records.

Subject's Name: [Subject's Full Name]
Signature: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________
Witness (if applicable):
Witness's Name: [Witness's Full Name]
Signature: ______________________________
Date: ______________________________

Picture of Me from Symbolics

Courtesy of Tom McMahon

Fundamentals for LLMs and Image Diffusion

 

I am enjoying Midjourney very much.  I presume I would be as impressed with any LLM (large language model) driven image diffusion system but this is the only one I have played with.  I feel completely awed and blindsided by the range of capabilities I have seen here.  Where did this come from?  How does it work?  To save you the effort of finding out, I am endeavoring to collect a list of topics it will be necessary to have at least a passing familiarity with in order to understand this modern miracle.  It probably wont be necessary for you to be a genius at any of these topics, perhaps, but it may be necessary for you to know something about all of these if you want to know what is going on beneath the hood and maybe predict where this kind of technology is going.

 

To give you an idea about why I find this so compelling and disturbing, here is the result of "/imagine vintage photograph of king kong climbing the Chrysler building".

 

 

 

A partial list of technologies involved include 

 

Latent Variable Models

Variational Autoencoder

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)

Semantic Image Synthesis

 

and more to come.

Photoshopped Mug Shots

Tom McMahon points out that the Fulton County logo is different sizes in the various mug shots.  My guess is that Trump has simply photoshopped his image to reduce the size of law enforcement and probably to clean up his image so he doesnt look as old as he actually is.  In other words, its faked, and of course our weak and stupid news media isnt able to point this out.

 

Examine the following mug shots.  What do you notice.

 

 

 

Thats right.  Four of them are nearly identical in composition, one looks like it was cropped, and one, of the cheeseball rapist himself, has clearly been modified to reduce the Fulton County logo.  Oh yes, he has also had his face retouched to make him look younger than his age.

[Oh Oh!  Did I say something that is going to make the people who regulate free speech on the Internet mad at me again?  Is this "hate speech" because I express my opinion about Trump and the news media?  Will Boingo and Akemai block me again, or more, or in addition to how they have blocked me already?]

Art, Moral Improvement and Midjourney

Some people believe that art can inspire people to be their better selves.  Can art result in moral improvement?

 

Using Midjourney at the lower levels of subscription is like using a party line (for those of you who know what that is).  Everyone in your Discord group can see your work and you can see what they are doing.

 

I had nothing to do with the following image.  The theme it represents is an old one, still I thought it was entertaining and well executed.  I was impressed that this technology can produce an image that looks like this right out of the box.

Is the 14th Amendment to the Constitution Real?

A recent editorial by Turley in thehill.com argues that of course the 14th amendment is not relevant or in current use.  I dont expect Republicans to agree with me on much, but I dont appreciate it when they insult my intelligence.  And this has larger implications.

I wonder if I am just being overly precious about what is standard debating / rhetorical technique. I find it offensive that a republican that has been so very adament about "original intent" and "every word is precious in the constitution" would then with a straight face say "oh, that 14th amendment, ha ha, they werent serious". When in fact they were very serious, the clause is to our amazement completely relevant to the current situation. But these are republicans which means that they have no credibility when it comes to actually defending and supporting this country (see two impeachment fails to convict, there will never be a better case for impeachment in our lifetimes). The conclusion I reached long ago is that it does not matter what arguments a Republican makes, they arent serious, they are just lying to steal the money. Well, OK, nobody's perfect, but this is a very dangerous situation and this kind of glib bullshit reinforces the belief that the Republican party is the enemy of this country and must be removed from any critical political and judicial position. There is no point in compromising with these people. They are literally the enemy just as much as, for example, Vlad Putin is.

A corollary of this is that whenever a "democrat" says "bipartisan", I think "traitor". There is no point in compromising with fascists, they are just stalling for advantage.