Showing posts with label American Folklore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American Folklore. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 25, 2013
The American Tradition of Christmas and the Mystery of the Aluminum Christmas Tree
Since most of what American's think they know about this tradition of Christmas is mostly wrong, I am repeating a report on the topic, the history of the American tradition of Christmas. It should not surprise anyone to know that this tradition as we know it is rather recent, even though it contains some much older elements.
http://globalwahrman.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-american-tradition-of-christmas-and.html
Friday, December 13, 2013
The Prophesy of John Hendrix (1865 - 1915)
This post is part of the "Archaeology of the Cold War" series.
From time to time, we will review entertaining stories of anomalous events, events which are unlikely to have occurred but would be very interesting if they had as that would imply unknown physics or stand as examples of phenomena such as time travel, ghosts, predicting the future and so forth. This category is in opposition to another topic of discussion on this blog, which is the creation of entertainment fiction that purports to predict the future. That however is a different topic from the one in this post. This topic is more in the nature of oral history that, if true, would mean that someone long ago had predicted the future.
From time to time, we will review entertaining stories of anomalous events, events which are unlikely to have occurred but would be very interesting if they had as that would imply unknown physics or stand as examples of phenomena such as time travel, ghosts, predicting the future and so forth. This category is in opposition to another topic of discussion on this blog, which is the creation of entertainment fiction that purports to predict the future. That however is a different topic from the one in this post. This topic is more in the nature of oral history that, if true, would mean that someone long ago had predicted the future.
The story goes something like this...
Once upon a time, in a very rural area
of Tennessee, there lived a man named John Hendrix. Mr. Hendrix, who
was born in 1865 and died in 1915, became distraught after the death
of his daughter and his separation from his wife and the rest of his
family. He became very religious and started to report having
visions. Supposedly he told everyone about his visions and nobody paid much attention.
As silent as the grave
Hendrix described the vision that was
given him as follows:
In the woods, as I lay on the ground
and looked up into the sky, there came to me a voice as loud and as
sharp as thunder. The voice told me to sleep with my head on the
ground for 40 nights and I would be shown visions of what the future
holds for this land.... And I tell you, Bear Creek Valley someday
will be filled with great buildings and factories, and they will help
toward winning the greatest war that ever will be. And there will be
a city on Black Oak Ridge and the center of authority will be on a
spot middle-way between Sevier Tadlock's farm and Joe Pyatt's Place.
A railroad spur will branch off the main L&N line, run
down toward Robertsville and then branch off and turn toward
Scarborough. Big engines will dig big ditches, and thousands of
people will be running to and fro. They will be building things, and
there will be great noise and confusion and the earth will shake.
I've seen it. It's coming.
Of course no one believed him, John was
being just a little crazy, they thought. Well maybe more than a
little crazy and it seemed that he was institutionalized for a time.
But the years went by and there was no great city in Bear Creek
Valley or up on Black Oak Ridge. There was a great war but the war
got fought and won without any thousands of people running around in Eastern Tennessee or
new railway lines or earthquakes either. John died before what we now call World War I ended and that was all there was to say about the matter
until 1942 when the government came to kick the people of the four rural communities of that part of the world off their land.
Army Corps of Engineers picture of the old Hendrix home before they tore it down
About 60 years after Hendrix first
started having his visions, the US Army Corps of Engineers began
researching potential sites for several very large, experimental
industrial plants that needed to be built on a rush basis for some project they would not talk about. The plants needed to be far enough away from population centers and industrial areas so in the event that they exploded, the damage would be limited. They wanted to find a place that was sparsely settled so that they could quickly evict the people who were there and get started immediately. They also hoped to find a place that had physical barriers in the case that one plant exploded it would not cause others nearby to also explode. Access to a dam for water and a lot of electric power was critical. The further out in the country it was the easier it would be to keep secret. It needed to be near a rail line and existing road network because that would save time.
So one day the people of the four rural communities in this part of East Tennessee came home to find eviction notices nailed to their
door. Some of them were out in the rain within two weeks, some in
six weeks. They got a small amount of money for their land, but it
was not enough to buy its equivalent somewhere else. And to their
amazement, thousands of workers were bused in, a city with hundreds and hundreds of houses and dozens of stores and restaurants was built seemingly overnight,
security fences were put up and, strangest of all, very large factories were built behind those fences that had armed guards who promised to shoot you if you did not go away.
These new people chose a name for what was now their community and they chose to modify the name of part of the countryside thereabouts. They named their town for the same Black Oak Ridge that crazy old John Hendrix had talked about in his visions.
Only they left out the "Black"
and just called it Oak Ridge.
Scarboro? Never heard of it.
So as time went by, people remembered
crazy old John Hendrix and his visions. You can read more about
them in the links below. People marvelled at the amazing story of
the man who saw the future and predicted the project that may have
won the war.
So what are the possible explanations.
On the one hand, Hendrix may have seen the future as described. Who
knows, it wasn't particularly written down, it was just something
people remembered. Hendrix certainly lived and he was on record for
having been institutionalized and people can point to his grave.
Maybe he did see the future, or maybe when the future imposed itself
so violently on the peaceful citizens of that valley in Tennessee, the
pissed-off locals chose to repurpose a member of their community, now
deceased, who had truly lived when they said he did and died when they
said he did and who had been a little crazy and got put away for a
time because of that. All true, all part of the public record. Maybe, now that you mention it, this was one of his visions, I seem
to recall.
Maybe it was and maybe it wasn't, ain't
too many people around these days who were around then and would
contradict us, so you are going to have to take our word for it, I
reckon. And maybe we can make a few dollars selling trinkets and
entertaining all those thousands of gullible people who are running
to and fro on what used to be our land up there on Black Oak Ridge.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Economic Terrorism and Tea Parties Past and Present
Choosing a label for something, whether a car, a novel or a political movement, is a tricky thing. It requires inspiration to do well and sometimes it requires imagination and the ability to see the title from other points of view in order to judge how good or appropriate that title may be. A Chevy Nova might become a humorously-labeled "No Go" in Hispanic countries. A Tea Party might be a famous and colorful incident in a successful war of independence, or it might be an act of economic terrorism which hurts innocent people and leads to a war with vast disruption of many people's lives.
Lets look at the famous Boston Tea Party using modern terminology and a less overtly American-after-the-fact point of view. There may be some irony in our right-wing fanatics choosing to call themselves the Tea Party, after all.
Here are a few basic statements about the Boston Tea Party which I think are quite defensible once you remove the blinders that says they were "patriots fighting against oppressors".
1. The Boston Tea Party was a violent
act of economic terrorism to attain extremist political goals.
Whoever did it, and we do not actually
know who they were, deliberately broke onto three ships in the
harbor and destroyed other people's property. Where were they guards? All ships are guarded in port. Were they bribed ? How many were injured? How many might have been injured?
2. We do not know who these people were.
The Tea Party was
executed by a group of anonymous fanatics who took the law into their
own hands. We know an awful lot about that period of America. We know who spoke at a major meeting at Fanuil Hall when the terrorist act was committed, but we do not know who were in those outfits executing the criminal acts outside. You may hear or read about the "Sons of Liberty"
but that means very little in this case. Everyone called themselves
the "Sons of Liberty" those days. In modern parlance, we would call it an "umbrella terrorist organization". Who were they? What
are their names? Who
financed it? We do not know.
There is speculation about who might have been involved. I can tell you some very amusing theories which actually does implicate a radical (and famous) Freemasonry lodge. (2) Maybe John Adams knew, and maybe he didn't. But so far as I know, all evidence is circumstantial.
3. The Boston Tea Party was a Failed "False Flag" Operation
These days you hear a lot of people throwing around intelligence community jargon as if they knew the first thing about it. One of those terms is "false flag" which is where a country or organization mounts an operation but tries to make it look like someone else did it. That is what the people, whoever they were, who did the Boston Tea Party tried to do. They tried to make it look like an indian nation, the Mohawks, did the deed. Of course no one believed them for a second.
So what we have here is a botched false flag operation executed by amateurs.
3. The Boston Tea Party was a Failed "False Flag" Operation
These days you hear a lot of people throwing around intelligence community jargon as if they knew the first thing about it. One of those terms is "false flag" which is where a country or organization mounts an operation but tries to make it look like someone else did it. That is what the people, whoever they were, who did the Boston Tea Party tried to do. They tried to make it look like an indian nation, the Mohawks, did the deed. Of course no one believed them for a second.
So what we have here is a botched false flag operation executed by amateurs.
4. The terrorists clearly committed criminal acts.
One man's terrorist is another's
freedom fighter. Massachusetts had laws. They broke them. Yes, that might have been a reaction to some taxes which were "unfair", so what? I think lots of taxes are unfair but I do not go around blowing up the California Franchise Tax Board (even if it is a tempting thought). They committed these crimes to provoke a reaction from the central government and they got what they
wanted. Property was destroyed. People were hurt, if not that night, then in the days and nights to come.
5. The Result was Anarchy and War.
The situation spun out of control and
we had a full-scale war and revolution on our hands. Estimates are that 15 to 20 percent of the population of the colonies were loyalists (1) and left (or
were forced to leave) for what became Canada. Of course this is the war that the terrorists wanted to provoke with their acts.
So what I want to propose to you here is that the modern Tea Party may have unintentionally chosen a very appropriate name for their organization, naming it as they did after cowardly, extremist political radicals and incompetents who violated the law and caused a war.
Good choice, guys.
Wikipedia page on Loyalists
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
Good choice, guys.
Wikipedia page on Loyalists
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalist_(American_Revolution)
___________________________________________________
1. I have heard different numbers for the percentage of the population of the 13 colonies who were loyalists, and for how many left or were forced to leave. The 15 to 20 percent is on the low side, I think.
2. In NYC, the most important Freemason temple was refurbished and on the opening night gave a talk to the public inviting them to have a look and to hear about Freemasons in their own words. This would have been mid-late 1990s. The talk was very interesting and among things discussed the American Revolution because there is so much myth out there that the Revolution was sponsored and let by Freemasons. Our speaker was quite dismissive for the most part. Yes there were Freemasons in the Revolution, but there were many Freemasons on the British and Loyalist sides as well. Yes, there are incidents where a Freemason was able to help a brother in distress, but there are also events where a Brother signalled distress and did not receive help. But he said there was one intriguing story where it may have been that the Freemasons did have a genuine role in instigating the revolution, and the story is this.
Freemasonry is mostly a social and charitable organization, a so-called fraternal organization. They meet once a week, each lodge in its own place and normally do such exciting things as plan a charitable event for a hospital, or work on initiating members, or discussing their obscure lore. Each lodge has its own personality, and attracts its own types of members. In the pre-revolutionary days there was a famous radical lodge outside Boston. I forget where exactly he said it was, but apparently it is quite famous and they met in a pub, I think, and that pub is still there. The lodges all kept books recording the minutes of their meetings and they have the log books for this lodge. On the night of the Boston Tea Party, only 3 members of the lodge showed up. They immediately called the meeting to order and dismissed it. Nothing else. The speculation is that the rest of the lodge (and maybe also those three members who showed up to formally hold the mini meeting), who were all radical citizens apparently in favor of opposing the British and in favor of separation from Britain, the speculation is that they were the people in costume and on the boats that night. Apparently it would have been about the right number of people. The evidence is not close to definitive, but at least it is an explanation of who they might have been, and if so, how they were organized and how they did such things as organize their costumes etc.
I consider this just an amusing story, submitted for your consideration.
1. I have heard different numbers for the percentage of the population of the 13 colonies who were loyalists, and for how many left or were forced to leave. The 15 to 20 percent is on the low side, I think.
2. In NYC, the most important Freemason temple was refurbished and on the opening night gave a talk to the public inviting them to have a look and to hear about Freemasons in their own words. This would have been mid-late 1990s. The talk was very interesting and among things discussed the American Revolution because there is so much myth out there that the Revolution was sponsored and let by Freemasons. Our speaker was quite dismissive for the most part. Yes there were Freemasons in the Revolution, but there were many Freemasons on the British and Loyalist sides as well. Yes, there are incidents where a Freemason was able to help a brother in distress, but there are also events where a Brother signalled distress and did not receive help. But he said there was one intriguing story where it may have been that the Freemasons did have a genuine role in instigating the revolution, and the story is this.
Freemasonry is mostly a social and charitable organization, a so-called fraternal organization. They meet once a week, each lodge in its own place and normally do such exciting things as plan a charitable event for a hospital, or work on initiating members, or discussing their obscure lore. Each lodge has its own personality, and attracts its own types of members. In the pre-revolutionary days there was a famous radical lodge outside Boston. I forget where exactly he said it was, but apparently it is quite famous and they met in a pub, I think, and that pub is still there. The lodges all kept books recording the minutes of their meetings and they have the log books for this lodge. On the night of the Boston Tea Party, only 3 members of the lodge showed up. They immediately called the meeting to order and dismissed it. Nothing else. The speculation is that the rest of the lodge (and maybe also those three members who showed up to formally hold the mini meeting), who were all radical citizens apparently in favor of opposing the British and in favor of separation from Britain, the speculation is that they were the people in costume and on the boats that night. Apparently it would have been about the right number of people. The evidence is not close to definitive, but at least it is an explanation of who they might have been, and if so, how they were organized and how they did such things as organize their costumes etc.
I consider this just an amusing story, submitted for your consideration.
Friday, September 27, 2013
The Uses of Procrastination: The Origins of Pork Barrel and Lobbying
As we stare into the darkness of
the inevitable failure of our lives, what could be better than to
waste a little time looking up things on the Internet? The
Internet is a Bold New Paradigm (tm) and provides endless opportunity
to learn a little about nearly everything, as long as what you want
to learn is not complete, well-presented or, in many cases, accurate.
These are details that have nothing whatsoever to do with its value
as a time waster however.
Today I want to enlighten you with two
important words in our uniquely American political language. The
origins of one of them I have known for a long time, the other I just
learned on the Internet recently. So as to give you fair warning, I
am going to name those two words now and ask you to think about what
they might have originally meant, or what their origin might have
been.
The words are "pork barrel"
and "lobbyist".
In modern parlance, the term pork
barrel politics refers to a congressman arranging for his
district to receive some federal project that pumps money into the
local economy. This would usually take the form of construction
projects, such as highways, bridges, etc. It might take the form of
an Army or Navy base, or it might be in the form of a military
procurement that spends some of its money in that district. By this
definition, the building of the 1st six frigates for the US Navy
during the Geo. Washington administration was a pork barrel project,
because it began the navy tradition of spreading the work out across
as many states as possible to increase congressional support for the
project. In the case of the six frigates, each one was built in a
different seaport, each in a different state. That is six states out
of thirteen, not a bad spread. An informed discussion of this term
would have the first use of the term in the
congressional record, but I do not have that kind of information
here. This is the Internet, after all.
The pork barrel harkens back to a time in
history when salt was a major means of preservation of food. In
agricultural America, various farms and homesteads would have a
central place that might serve as the location of a church, a post
office, and a general store. At the general store one might find a
variety of goods, bulk foods, hardware, etc. One of features of
your general country store would have been the "pork barrel",
which was a barrel of salted pork. One would go to the county seat
on the weekend, perhaps, and pick up the mail, see some friends, and
pick up supplies at the store to bring home to the farm. One would
select some salted pork from the barrel and pay by weight,
presumably. Thus the analogy of bringing something home to one's
constituents from the pork barrel that was Washington. Surely we
are all allowed to bring something home from the pork barrel for our
families ? That is only fair.
Apparently with the origin of the term "lobbyist" we have an example of a self-reinforcing Internet myth. Fun but not true. The lobby in question refers to a famous old
hotel in DC which is two blocks away from the White House, the
Willard Hotel. It was at one time the only hotel you could stay at
in DC and still easily get to the major attractions or see all the
possible people you needed to see to do business in Washington.
When Grant was president, being one of our more social presidents, he
liked to go out for a drink and a smoke, and he usually went to the
lobby and bar of the Willard hotel.
The restored lobby of the Willard Hotel presumably without the spitoons that would have been there in Grant's day
This meant that you could hang out in
the lobby of the hotel and have a good chance of just running into
the president many evenings of the week, and have a few informal
words with him on some topic. This became known in town as
"lobbying", the people who did it were called "lobbyists",
the verb was "to lobby".
Its a fun story, but I am told, just not true. The origin of the term "to lobby" comes from England and parliament and refers to the lobbies where the members of parliament would assemble before going into the chambers to debate and vote. The process of researching this word reminds me that the Internet is NOT a substitute for solid reference material, probably in print, next to your computer terminal.
The implication is that the term "lobbyist" is not uniquely American in the least, it is a shared term of art with our brothers in crime, Great Britain.
Its a fun story, but I am told, just not true. The origin of the term "to lobby" comes from England and parliament and refers to the lobbies where the members of parliament would assemble before going into the chambers to debate and vote. The process of researching this word reminds me that the Internet is NOT a substitute for solid reference material, probably in print, next to your computer terminal.
The implication is that the term "lobbyist" is not uniquely American in the least, it is a shared term of art with our brothers in crime, Great Britain.
We hope you have been enlightened and
entertained by this vital information and that we have contributed to
the wastage of what little time you have left in a suitably amusing
manner.
The Willard Intercontinental Washington
Monday, December 24, 2012
The American Tradition of Christmas and the Mystery of the Aluminum Christmas Tree
In the spirit of the holidays, I set
out to write a short essay on what I had learned about the origins of
our Midwinter holiday and its traditions. I grew up in Virginia
where Christmas was a much more important religious holiday than it
is out here or other places I have lived, so perhaps that explains my
interest.
So in this essay, I hoped to cover (a) the specific mechanisms by which Christmas traditions came into the popular culture in this country, (b) why these traditions seem to be rather oddly selected from a much larger set of European traditions, (c) why these traditions seem to be rather secular, which is odd, given that nature of the holiday, (d) whether any of these traditions are in any way based on the old religions of Europe as might seem likely in a few cases (e.g. the decorated evergreen), (e) why it is that Virginia seemed more devout and frankly Christian in its celebration than other places I have lived in this country, and (f) why an Aluminum Christmas Tree. Lesser issues would also include the origins of the Yule Log, the various nativity scenes that are often set up, the tradition of the shop window Christmas displays such as one sees at Macy's in New York City, and the tradition of the candle in the window as one sees in Virginia.
Implicit in this might be why a third generation atheist liberal Jewish Virginian family such as mine should celebrate Christmas at all. Not all of these questions are answered in this essay, but a few of them are partially answered.
So in this essay, I hoped to cover (a) the specific mechanisms by which Christmas traditions came into the popular culture in this country, (b) why these traditions seem to be rather oddly selected from a much larger set of European traditions, (c) why these traditions seem to be rather secular, which is odd, given that nature of the holiday, (d) whether any of these traditions are in any way based on the old religions of Europe as might seem likely in a few cases (e.g. the decorated evergreen), (e) why it is that Virginia seemed more devout and frankly Christian in its celebration than other places I have lived in this country, and (f) why an Aluminum Christmas Tree. Lesser issues would also include the origins of the Yule Log, the various nativity scenes that are often set up, the tradition of the shop window Christmas displays such as one sees at Macy's in New York City, and the tradition of the candle in the window as one sees in Virginia.
Implicit in this might be why a third generation atheist liberal Jewish Virginian family such as mine should celebrate Christmas at all. Not all of these questions are answered in this essay, but a few of them are partially answered.
When I grew up in Virginia we had an
aluminum Christmas tree. My father, a reformed sports writer, worked
for Reynolds Aluminum and perhaps that is why we had a Christmas
tree. It was pretty great, although as you might imagine it did not
smell as good as a real evergreen. I always wanted to know where
this thing had come from.
As I studied the origins of the various
traditions of Christmas that I had experienced while growing up, two observations were reinforced, none of them particularly original. The first is that what we celebrate in America seems to be combination of (as you would expect) a large number of Anglo-Saxon traditions in place about the time of the colonization but with an almost equal number of traditions seemingly picked almost at random from a large number of potential continental European traditions. The second observation was that these traditions were nearly all secular in origin and purpose.
But a third observation was somewhat new to me, but certainly not new to others who had studied the topic. Apparently a significant number of attributes of what we consider to be a traditional Christmas celebration actually is American in origin and rather recent, e.g. the 19th century. They just pretend to be older traditions, something I find amusing.
But a third observation was somewhat new to me, but certainly not new to others who had studied the topic. Apparently a significant number of attributes of what we consider to be a traditional Christmas celebration actually is American in origin and rather recent, e.g. the 19th century. They just pretend to be older traditions, something I find amusing.
The following is an incomplete list of
my research. I expect that many of you knew this already, but I did
not know most of this.
I wish to emphasize here that there is a lot bad information out there which I hope I am not contributing to, but I probably am. One such "wrong" belief is the common lore about the origin of the date of Christmas, at least in the Western Church, December 25th. For many years I thought that it was accepted that the date of the Western Church's Christmas came from a very specific holiday, Sol Invictus, of the late Roman Empire. I had been led to believe this by literally dozens and dozens of essays on the subject. Looking a bit closer, I learn, again, that what one is commonly told is just flat out false. So we begin with the issue of why December 25.
I wish to emphasize here that there is a lot bad information out there which I hope I am not contributing to, but I probably am. One such "wrong" belief is the common lore about the origin of the date of Christmas, at least in the Western Church, December 25th. For many years I thought that it was accepted that the date of the Western Church's Christmas came from a very specific holiday, Sol Invictus, of the late Roman Empire. I had been led to believe this by literally dozens and dozens of essays on the subject. Looking a bit closer, I learn, again, that what one is commonly told is just flat out false. So we begin with the issue of why December 25.
1. Most historians do NOT believe that
the Western Church celebrates Christmas on December 25th because it
was the date of a significant Roman religious celebration (e.g. Sol
Invictus, the Unconquered Sun, which was itself layered on top of other previous
traditions). They do not believe it, because when Christians had
started celebrating the birth of Christ, in the 3rd century AD, they
were still in their conflict with Rome, e.g. before Constantine, and working hard to distance themselves from
pagan traditions in any way they could.
The most commonly held belief among scholars for the date has to do with the psychology of determining aspects of Jesus's life from traditions in the so-called Old Testament regarding prophecy of the Messiah. The trick here is to find a day such that Jesus was conceived (not born, conceived in Mary's womb, e.g. a miracle) and executed which was the same day of the year although obviously in a different year. So take the date of the Crucifixion as the date of conception, advance 9 months for a canonical pregnancy period, and you have December 25 as a birth date. People used to do calculations like this all the time back in the good old days (e.g. 2000 years ago).
This is a specific example of a larger heuristic: that if Jesus was the messiah, then he must have fulfilled various biblical prophecy about who the messiah was. Therefore, people worked backwards from these prophecies or what they thought those prophecies must have been to determine details about Jesus for which there was no clear documentation. Getting to the bottom of what was and what was not prophecy for this and other matters is a job for a specialist, and I am not going to go further here.
Note that the Eastern Church(es) also have disparate ways of celebrating the event, but their chosen day is January 6. Note that this is all mixed in with issues involving the Marian traditions of the various churches, specifically the Feast of the Annunciation which celebrates the visit by the Angel Gabriel to Mary to tell her that she should expect a blessed event, as unlikely as that might have seemed to her at the time.
This reminds me of a joke I learned in the Upper West Side of New York. How to annoy your Christian friends on Christmas day. On Christmas, you call up a friend and invite them out for pizza. When they say "But today is Christmas!", you feign ignorance and say: "Oh! Is that today?"
The most commonly held belief among scholars for the date has to do with the psychology of determining aspects of Jesus's life from traditions in the so-called Old Testament regarding prophecy of the Messiah. The trick here is to find a day such that Jesus was conceived (not born, conceived in Mary's womb, e.g. a miracle) and executed which was the same day of the year although obviously in a different year. So take the date of the Crucifixion as the date of conception, advance 9 months for a canonical pregnancy period, and you have December 25 as a birth date. People used to do calculations like this all the time back in the good old days (e.g. 2000 years ago).
This is a specific example of a larger heuristic: that if Jesus was the messiah, then he must have fulfilled various biblical prophecy about who the messiah was. Therefore, people worked backwards from these prophecies or what they thought those prophecies must have been to determine details about Jesus for which there was no clear documentation. Getting to the bottom of what was and what was not prophecy for this and other matters is a job for a specialist, and I am not going to go further here.
Note that the Eastern Church(es) also have disparate ways of celebrating the event, but their chosen day is January 6. Note that this is all mixed in with issues involving the Marian traditions of the various churches, specifically the Feast of the Annunciation which celebrates the visit by the Angel Gabriel to Mary to tell her that she should expect a blessed event, as unlikely as that might have seemed to her at the time.
This reminds me of a joke I learned in the Upper West Side of New York. How to annoy your Christian friends on Christmas day. On Christmas, you call up a friend and invite them out for pizza. When they say "But today is Christmas!", you feign ignorance and say: "Oh! Is that today?"
2. There were various traditions in
Anglo-Saxon England for midwinter celebrations, including the
tradition of a family dinner on December 25th (the wealthy had roast
beef, but the poorer classes had a goose which was far less
expensive, hence the Christmas goose). And also a tradition of
people singing carols outside homes on Christmas eve, particularly
homes where they might expect the people inside to give them a few
coins for their effort. In other words, it was mixed in with the
various traditions that make it more socially acceptable for the poor
to request money from the more wealthy on a special day. Many of
these traditions would have crossed the Atlantic with the settlers,
particularly those who came to the more Anglican part of the
colonies, e.g. Virginia and also (but its more complicated) to the
mid-Atlantic states.
[I am told that beef is now much less expensive than goose today, but the point that Hutton was trying to make was that goose was less expensive back then].
3. Most Americans are blissfully ignorant of most of the history of the Protestant Reformation and the Catholic Counter-Reformation, but this affected everything in Europe and it certainly affected the Colonies and what beliefs were transferred. England had a reformation all its own and there were several centuries of a complicated and messy process of determining which pre-reformation traditions they were going to keep, and which they were going to suppress. But the more purely Calvinist in England believed rather strongly that the celebration of Christ's birth was an accretion that was not justified by scripture, more papist frippery if you will. As you must have guessed by now, these Calvinist dissenters emigrated (or some of them did) to New England and are who we incorrectly call Puritans.
[I am told that beef is now much less expensive than goose today, but the point that Hutton was trying to make was that goose was less expensive back then].
3. Most Americans are blissfully ignorant of most of the history of the Protestant Reformation and the Catholic Counter-Reformation, but this affected everything in Europe and it certainly affected the Colonies and what beliefs were transferred. England had a reformation all its own and there were several centuries of a complicated and messy process of determining which pre-reformation traditions they were going to keep, and which they were going to suppress. But the more purely Calvinist in England believed rather strongly that the celebration of Christ's birth was an accretion that was not justified by scripture, more papist frippery if you will. As you must have guessed by now, these Calvinist dissenters emigrated (or some of them did) to New England and are who we incorrectly call Puritans.
4. So to begin with we have the
Calvinists of New England, the more Anglican states like Virginia,
and the mid-Atlantic states which have their own unique story here
including as it does not only members of the Roman Catholic church
but also protestants from other parts of Europe, especially and
including the Low Countries, e.g. the Dutch Netherlands who settled
New Amsterdam, and various regions of Germany who went to various places in the middle Atlantic, often Pennsylvania, and still spoke German and maintained
their traditions. Other dissenters from England, not the Calvinists we call Puritans, but of other beliefs, such as Quakers, generally went to the middle Atlantic states.
[Just a reminder, the Calvinists mostly went to New England to build their "City on the Hill". People of other variations on the theme of Christianity, e.g. Quakers, Catholics, presumably Lutherans, in general went to the mid-Atlantic states: New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland. Various religious groups went to Virginia but most of them were vanilla Anglicans of one school or another. There were also other faiths such as Presbyterian in Virginia from the earliest days. This is not a hard and fast rule: the Calvinists in New England were quite strict, but the mid-Atlantic states were specifically open, and Virginia and other territories did not have much of a policy either way as far as I can tell. What they did have was an Anglican "founder effect" which persists to this day.]
[Just a reminder, the Calvinists mostly went to New England to build their "City on the Hill". People of other variations on the theme of Christianity, e.g. Quakers, Catholics, presumably Lutherans, in general went to the mid-Atlantic states: New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland. Various religious groups went to Virginia but most of them were vanilla Anglicans of one school or another. There were also other faiths such as Presbyterian in Virginia from the earliest days. This is not a hard and fast rule: the Calvinists in New England were quite strict, but the mid-Atlantic states were specifically open, and Virginia and other territories did not have much of a policy either way as far as I can tell. What they did have was an Anglican "founder effect" which persists to this day.]
5. We now jump ahead to after the
American Revolution: the Anglicans in this country have become
Episcopalians because of the issue of Archbishop of Canterbury
needing to swear loyalty to the King. New England is no longer a pure Calvinist enclave but has begrudingly diversified by allowing people of other faiths to live among them. The Middle Atlantic states have enclaves of Germans who
are true to their traditions and language. And there have been a few
Jews there all along the seaboard, from top to bottom, although they
play very little role in the rest of our story ironically since, of
course, Jesus was a very devout 1st Century AD Jewish apocalyptic
prophet and the influence of Judaism is all over the various
Christianities in various diverse ways. There are other minority communities seeded here and there in North America, keeping or not keeping to their traditions each in their own way.
6. Our story now enters the 19th century, e.g. from the 1800's on, and we have some specific events in popular culture that have immense impact.
In 1809, former lawyer and writer Washington Irving, executed a hoax claiming that a Dutch writer and historian, Diedrich Knickerbocker, had disappeared and failed to pay his hotel bill, and if he or someone on his behalf did not pay the bill, that the hotel would publish a manuscript found in his room.
This was all made up of course, and the manuscript had been authored by Washington Irving and purported to be a history of New York from the beginning of time to the present day, from a Dutch point of view. This was also a satire on the self-important local histories that one could find in different communities.
New Yorkers fell for this hoax hook, line and sinker, and as it was serialized, it went viral, as we say today. A search was supposedly made for the disappeared Dutch historian, Mr. Knickerbocker, but to no avail. Eventually the book got published, was very popular and established Mr. Irving's reputation.
In the history of New Amsterdam, Irving/Knickerbocker discuss the traditions from the Low Countries of Sinterklaas, of St. Nicholas, and of hanging stockings by the bed to be filled mysteriously with various edible goodies and toys by the morning of Christmas Day. And this is the accepted version of the specific reason that we in America who are not from the Low Countries originally associate Santa Claus, St. Nicholas and hanging stockings on Christmas Eve with Christmas.
Knickerbocker's History of New York Complete by Washington Irving
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/13042
7. In England another writer, and social reformer, Charles Dickens, was struggling with his work and very upset about the poverty and misery among the working poor, after a lecture he gave in Manchester in 1843, walked around Manchester at night and conceived of a story of a greedy industrialist who is visited one Christmas eve by the ghost of his former business partner. He went home and wrote the story as a short novel in six weeks and published it on 19 December 1843. To his surprise, it became immensely popular, and has never been out of print since.
According to various accounts, including that of historian Ronald Hutton, whose book we discuss later, this story had a vast impact. From it, he claims, came the particularly British charitable tradition that no one should go hungry on Christmas. Whether or not this is true seems difficult to believe, but that is what he and other sources say. Furthermore, it supposedly influenced an industrialist to begin the tradition of letting the workers have Christmas Day off, a tradition our right wing has been fighting and trying to destroy ever since.
[My readers in England dispute that Dickens was ever surprised by his success and dispute that Christmas Carol had that much influence on the charitable organizations. I also wonder about this, but historians such as Hutton claim up and down that it is true. Read Hutton and tell me what you think.]
This was all made up of course, and the manuscript had been authored by Washington Irving and purported to be a history of New York from the beginning of time to the present day, from a Dutch point of view. This was also a satire on the self-important local histories that one could find in different communities.
New Yorkers fell for this hoax hook, line and sinker, and as it was serialized, it went viral, as we say today. A search was supposedly made for the disappeared Dutch historian, Mr. Knickerbocker, but to no avail. Eventually the book got published, was very popular and established Mr. Irving's reputation.
In the history of New Amsterdam, Irving/Knickerbocker discuss the traditions from the Low Countries of Sinterklaas, of St. Nicholas, and of hanging stockings by the bed to be filled mysteriously with various edible goodies and toys by the morning of Christmas Day. And this is the accepted version of the specific reason that we in America who are not from the Low Countries originally associate Santa Claus, St. Nicholas and hanging stockings on Christmas Eve with Christmas.
Knickerbocker's History of New York Complete by Washington Irving
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/13042
7. In England another writer, and social reformer, Charles Dickens, was struggling with his work and very upset about the poverty and misery among the working poor, after a lecture he gave in Manchester in 1843, walked around Manchester at night and conceived of a story of a greedy industrialist who is visited one Christmas eve by the ghost of his former business partner. He went home and wrote the story as a short novel in six weeks and published it on 19 December 1843. To his surprise, it became immensely popular, and has never been out of print since.
According to various accounts, including that of historian Ronald Hutton, whose book we discuss later, this story had a vast impact. From it, he claims, came the particularly British charitable tradition that no one should go hungry on Christmas. Whether or not this is true seems difficult to believe, but that is what he and other sources say. Furthermore, it supposedly influenced an industrialist to begin the tradition of letting the workers have Christmas Day off, a tradition our right wing has been fighting and trying to destroy ever since.
[My readers in England dispute that Dickens was ever surprised by his success and dispute that Christmas Carol had that much influence on the charitable organizations. I also wonder about this, but historians such as Hutton claim up and down that it is true. Read Hutton and tell me what you think.]
8. Note we still have not explained
Santa Claus' sleigh with reindeer, with his bag of gifts, in a red suit, or even the notion
of having a decorated tree and other important
elements.
9. Then in 1823 a poem was published
anonymously in Troy, NY called "A Visit from St. Nicholas".
It had been written by a professor of Classics at Columbia
University and published without his permission (or his name) in a
local newspaper. The poem tells the story of a Christmas Eve and a
man who wakes up in the middle of the night to find a miniature sleigh flying
over his house with eight miniature reindeer, and a person who is recognized as St. Nicholas (an elven and miniaturized version of the 4th Century AD Greek saint and bishop, I suppose) who climbs down the chimney with
a sack of presents, and fills the children's stockings with candy.
The man and the mysterious visitor exchange a conspiratorial wink,
then the stranger leaves by the chimney and flies away saying "Happy
Christmas to all, and to all a good night!".
Clement Moore supposedly came up with the idea during a sleigh ride to do some Christmas shopping for his family, incorporating certain aspects about St. Nicholas that he had learned from a local Dutch handyman. But the rest of it, the sleigh, the eight reindeer, their names, etc, he made up himself out of whole cloth. This poem became immensely popular, went viral as we say, and I end the essay with it.
Clement Moore supposedly came up with the idea during a sleigh ride to do some Christmas shopping for his family, incorporating certain aspects about St. Nicholas that he had learned from a local Dutch handyman. But the rest of it, the sleigh, the eight reindeer, their names, etc, he made up himself out of whole cloth. This poem became immensely popular, went viral as we say, and I end the essay with it.
10. But we still have not explained the
tradition of the Christmas Tree. The various German ethnic groups
that had emigrated to this country, the Moravians, etc, had/have a
variety of traditions for their Christmas celebration. One of them
is the notion of having a tree, given the time of year it is an
evergreen, and having a celebration in which the tree is decorated
with little ornaments. Somehow this became something that the President of the United States did every year in the White House. But believe it or not, it is not clear when the tradition started. Some say it was in the 1850s when Franklin Pierce was President, and other say it was 1889 during the Harrison Administration. This became a tradition, became
electrified, and is now one of the ceremonies of the season in
Washington DC, the lighting of the Christmas tree. From this, it is alleged, having a Christmas tree became a generalized holiday tradition for the American household.
Implicit in this explanation is the idea that perhaps the President was running for reelection and was trying to attract votes from the German ethnic groups in this country. This last observation is pure cynical speculation on my part and is not in any way implied by anything I have read on the topic.
At some point we are going to get to the topic of the Aluminum Christmas tree, but this seems a good time to interject that Pierce or Harrison may electrify their tree, but if you have an aluminum tree it would be a very bad idea to try to electrify it. Aluminum is very conductive of electricity and an electrical short would be very exciting but also unpleasant. One uses an external color wheel to illuminate the tree in a festive manner.
Of course this begs the question of where the German's got their tradition from and whether it is a remnant of an archaic belief system, perhaps of the evergreen representing eternal life, as some assert. This essay will not go into that, it will have to be a topic for another time. For now we must be content with the notion of how a specific German tradition came into American popular culture.
Implicit in this explanation is the idea that perhaps the President was running for reelection and was trying to attract votes from the German ethnic groups in this country. This last observation is pure cynical speculation on my part and is not in any way implied by anything I have read on the topic.
At some point we are going to get to the topic of the Aluminum Christmas tree, but this seems a good time to interject that Pierce or Harrison may electrify their tree, but if you have an aluminum tree it would be a very bad idea to try to electrify it. Aluminum is very conductive of electricity and an electrical short would be very exciting but also unpleasant. One uses an external color wheel to illuminate the tree in a festive manner.
Of course this begs the question of where the German's got their tradition from and whether it is a remnant of an archaic belief system, perhaps of the evergreen representing eternal life, as some assert. This essay will not go into that, it will have to be a topic for another time. For now we must be content with the notion of how a specific German tradition came into American popular culture.
11. Although there is far more to mention, our research and this essay will almost but not quite end with mentioning one more influence because it was so important. Apparently, a lot of what Americans think about Christmas from a visual point of view came from an illustrator and publisher, Thomas Nast, in the mid to late
19th century. He is known for many things, including his depiction
of Boss Tweed, Uncle Sam and last but not least Santa Claus in his red suit (a Nast invention, among others). (I have checked and this Nast appears to have no relationship to Conde Nast).
Not allergic to cats, I hope!
But still we are not done, for we have
not explained the notion of an Aluminum Christmas Tree, the Yule Log, the candle in the window, why Virginia appears to be more devout (e.g. Christian) in their celebration, and other matters. I have not been able to figure out
where the Aluminum Christmas Tree came from but I suspect from the image I found online and put at the top of this essay, that it may have been a marketing effort on the part of the Richmond, Va based Reynolds Aluminum. I only know that we had
one and that I was very unhappy to hear that it had been thrown out
because it was in such bad shape after decades of use. It was in
our family when I was growing up, and I wish it was in our family
today.
What can we conclude from the stories reported above? That Christmas in this country was, as it appears to be, a pastiche of traditions from England and the rest of Europe, but not all of them by any means, and that they were in part selected for their secular character because many Americans were ambivalent about the various religious traditions of Europe. Whatever a stocking or a decorated tree may stand for, the relationship to the birth of Christ is not obvious. The closest we get to religion seems to be a reference to a saint (St. Nicholas) and that star at the top of the tree, which may indeed be the Star of Bethlehem. Even more amusing is that the details of many of these traditions were elaborated and created in this country by writers and artists of various types and only pretend to be older than they are.
When I transcribed Clement
Moore's poem written for his children, also published here without his permission as is traditional, I discovered to my amazement that I knew it by heart. I have no idea
how it is that I happened to know this poem by heart, but I do.
And so with that thought, I am wishing
you a happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night.
A Visit From St. Nicholas
'Twas the night before Christmas, when
all thro' the house
Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse;
The stockings were hung by the chimney with care,
In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be there;
The children were nestled all snug in their beds,
While visions of sugar plums danc'd in their heads,
Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse;
The stockings were hung by the chimney with care,
In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be there;
The children were nestled all snug in their beds,
While visions of sugar plums danc'd in their heads,
And Mama in her 'kerchief, and I in my
cap,
Had just settled our brains for a long winter's nap —
When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter,
I sprang from the bed to see what was the matter.
Away to the window I flew like a flash,
Tore open the shutters, and threw up the sash.
The moon on the breast of the new fallen snow,
Gave the luster of mid-day to objects below;
When, what to my wondering eyes should appear,
But a miniature sleigh, and eight tiny reindeer,
With a little old driver, so lively and quick,
I knew in a moment it must be St. Nick.
More rapid than eagles his coursers they came,
And he whistled, and shouted, and call'd them by name:
"Now! Dasher, now! Dancer, now! Prancer and Vixen,
"On! Comet, on! Cupid, on! Donder and Blitzen;
"To the top of the porch! To the top of the wall!
"Now dash away! Dash away! Dash away all!"
As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly,
When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky;
So up to the house-top the coursers they flew,
With the sleigh full of toys — and St. Nicholas too:
And then in a twinkling, I heard on the roof
The prancing and pawing of each little hoof.
As I drew in my head, and was turning around,
Down the chimney St. Nicholas came with a bound:
He was dress'd all in fur, from his head to his foot,
And his clothes were all tarnish'd with ashes and soot;
A bundle of toys was flung on his back,
And he look'd like a peddler just opening his pack:
His eyes — how they twinkled! His dimples: how merry,
His cheeks were like roses, his nose like a cherry;
His droll little mouth was drawn up like a bow,
And the beard of his chin was as white as the snow;
The stump of a pipe he held tight in his teeth,
And the smoke it encircled his head like a wreath.
He had a broad face, and a little round belly
That shook when he laugh'd, like a bowl full of jelly:
He was chubby and plump, a right jolly old elf,
And I laugh'd when I saw him in spite of myself;
A wink of his eye and a twist of his head
Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread.
He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work,
And fill'd all the stockings; then turn'd with a jerk,
And laying his finger aside of his nose
And giving a nod, up the chimney he rose.
He sprung to his sleigh, to his team gave a whistle,
And away they all flew, like the down of a thistle:
But I heard him exclaim, ere he drove out of sight —
Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night.
Had just settled our brains for a long winter's nap —
When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter,
I sprang from the bed to see what was the matter.
Away to the window I flew like a flash,
Tore open the shutters, and threw up the sash.
The moon on the breast of the new fallen snow,
Gave the luster of mid-day to objects below;
When, what to my wondering eyes should appear,
But a miniature sleigh, and eight tiny reindeer,
With a little old driver, so lively and quick,
I knew in a moment it must be St. Nick.
More rapid than eagles his coursers they came,
And he whistled, and shouted, and call'd them by name:
"Now! Dasher, now! Dancer, now! Prancer and Vixen,
"On! Comet, on! Cupid, on! Donder and Blitzen;
"To the top of the porch! To the top of the wall!
"Now dash away! Dash away! Dash away all!"
As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly,
When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky;
So up to the house-top the coursers they flew,
With the sleigh full of toys — and St. Nicholas too:
And then in a twinkling, I heard on the roof
The prancing and pawing of each little hoof.
As I drew in my head, and was turning around,
Down the chimney St. Nicholas came with a bound:
He was dress'd all in fur, from his head to his foot,
And his clothes were all tarnish'd with ashes and soot;
A bundle of toys was flung on his back,
And he look'd like a peddler just opening his pack:
His eyes — how they twinkled! His dimples: how merry,
His cheeks were like roses, his nose like a cherry;
His droll little mouth was drawn up like a bow,
And the beard of his chin was as white as the snow;
The stump of a pipe he held tight in his teeth,
And the smoke it encircled his head like a wreath.
He had a broad face, and a little round belly
That shook when he laugh'd, like a bowl full of jelly:
He was chubby and plump, a right jolly old elf,
And I laugh'd when I saw him in spite of myself;
A wink of his eye and a twist of his head
Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread.
He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work,
And fill'd all the stockings; then turn'd with a jerk,
And laying his finger aside of his nose
And giving a nod, up the chimney he rose.
He sprung to his sleigh, to his team gave a whistle,
And away they all flew, like the down of a thistle:
But I heard him exclaim, ere he drove out of sight —
Happy Christmas to all, and to all a good night.
____________________________
By far the most comprehensive work that discusses and attempts to explain where various Holiday traditions in England came from is Ronald Hutton's book "The Stations of the Sun". If you are at all interested in this topic, this is the book to get.
http://www.amazon.com/Stations-Sun-Ronald-Hutton/dp/0192854488
Essay on the origin of American
Christmas Myth and Customs
Clement Moore
Sinterklaas
A Christmas Carol Wikipedia Page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Christmas_Carol
The Manuscript for A Christmas Carol
http://www.themorgan.org/collections/works/dickens/ChristmasCarol/1
A Christmas Carol at Project Guttenberg
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/46
[December 25, 2012: This is the 4th rewrite of this essay, and it will not be the last].
[December 26, 2012: We have some comments from friends in England, see below].
[December 27, 2012: More rewrite on the date of Christmas]
[December 25, 2013: Miscellaneous but especially on the ambiguity of which president started the tree]
A Christmas Carol at Project Guttenberg
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/46
[December 25, 2012: This is the 4th rewrite of this essay, and it will not be the last].
[December 26, 2012: We have some comments from friends in England, see below].
[December 27, 2012: More rewrite on the date of Christmas]
[December 25, 2013: Miscellaneous but especially on the ambiguity of which president started the tree]
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)








