Showing posts with label the cinema. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the cinema. Show all posts
Thursday, December 20, 2018
The Death of Stalin
A fun movie about the shenanigans that occurred when First Secretary Joseph Stalin died. It helps to have a sense of humor about mass murder. Not too much blood on screen.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4686844/
Friday, November 9, 2018
The Big Lebowski and Carter Burwell
draft
This will be old news to many of you, but it was new to me.
I am slowly developing an appreciation for the movie The Big Lebowski (1998) by the Coen Brothers. I realize it has been out for a while and I am late to see its value.
What I had not realized was that computer music pioneer and composer Carter Burwell did the original music. Carter is distant cousin to my friends Carter Emmart and Jimmy Carter, and its really nice to see just how well he has done. He has worked on a movie that is sure to last as long as movies from our civilization last.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118715/
This will be old news to many of you, but it was new to me.
I am slowly developing an appreciation for the movie The Big Lebowski (1998) by the Coen Brothers. I realize it has been out for a while and I am late to see its value.
What I had not realized was that computer music pioneer and composer Carter Burwell did the original music. Carter is distant cousin to my friends Carter Emmart and Jimmy Carter, and its really nice to see just how well he has done. He has worked on a movie that is sure to last as long as movies from our civilization last.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118715/
Friday, February 23, 2018
Expectations and Black Panther
draft
I
recently saw Black Panther. I expected an important movie
about people in spandex, and instead I got a movie that discussed
such things as: 1. History is important to understanding a situation,
2. Mistakes made a generation ago that caused injustice will have an
impact on the situation today, 3. Subsaharan Africa has nations but
those nations are also made up of tribes with their own identity, 4.
History has many excellent examples where disaffected ex-patriots
serve in the army of a foreign power and come home with that
knowledge in a big way, 5. Both the good guy and the bad guy loved
their fathers, 6. Some people care about traditional ways of doing
things even if those ways do not seem entirely rational to those
outside the system.
I
could go on.
This
is not bad for a superhero movie.
Tuesday, September 5, 2017
Restoration of Dr. Strangelove and the Triumph of the Free Market
draft
Growing
up in America, I have been trained to believe that the “free
market” solves all problems. That the invisible hand will
inevitably lead to an equilibrium position that will be the optimal
use of resources. Like any good cult, we are also taught to
disregard any data or example that contradicts the central tenets.
Any such example must be shown to be invalid because the free market
is always right.
I
have an excellent example here where the free market is one more time
proven to not only find the optimal solution, it actually finds the
only possible solution that could be acceptable to a right thinking
American. No disgusting socialism or wooly thinking for us! The
free market is always right.
Once
upon a time, Stanley Kubrick attempted to put together a new print of
his classic Dr. Strangelove: Or How I learned to Stop Worrying and
Love the Bomb (1964). The
film is a classic of black and white cinematography and Kubrick was
tasked to put together the best possible set of prints for a
rerelease sometime long after the original release.
But
he discovered that what should have been a straightforward task was
not because the original negative of the film no longer existed. To
explain this, I have to explain something about how distribution
prints for film used to be made.
The
way this used to work was this: when you have finished editing a
film, you cut the various elements of the film together into an
original negative. From this original negative, which you hope to
touch as little as possible, you then create an interpositive (IP)
and from that an internegative (IN). From the IN you strike as many
prints as you need for exhibition.
Eventually
the IN wears out, and then you strike another IN from the IP. In this
way, you never touch the original negative any more than you
absolutely have to. But this costs money you see, not much money, but
money. So when the IN would wear out, instead of striking another IN
from the IP, the studio (?) would save a few bucks by just cutting
out the relevant parts of the neg and adding it to the IN and strike
more prints. Which means that the original negative no longer
existed, and the best that Kubrick could do was to go back to the IP.
In
order to save a few thousand dollars, the original and best version
of one of the classics of Western cinema was destroyed. As well it
should have been. Nothing is more sacred than the profits issued to
the shareholders. To even consider otherwise is sacrilage.
The idea that there are still morons out there who actually think that the profit-motive should have anything to do with cultural legacy or any other value driven topic, such as health care, education and justice, is clearly a person who has been driven mad by ideology and has nothing to contribute to the political process.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


