Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Trump and Judge Cannon Celebrate Courtesy of MidJourney and AI

 
Trump & Judge Cannon celebrate their great victory over justice and the hoax they have played on the American Public.    So much of the detail here seems to be "out of nowhere". 

The prompt was probably something like: "A room of corrupt politicians and a woman judge celebrate their victory over justice at a dinner party where a pig has been slaughtered and roasted with an apple in its mouth.  The politicians are dressed as clowns.  --ar 16:9"




Alternates:






Monday, July 15, 2024

Scenario for Trump Judicial Coup d'Etat

draft draft draft

I propose in this post that Trump will seize power, legally or illegally, in November.  To show this, lets review the various election result scenarios.  Check my logic here.

As we all know, it does not matter if the Democrats win the popular vote at the national level.  It is only the electoral college that matters and that is normally decided by the popular vote at the state level.

In our first scenario, Trump legitimately wins the electoral college and therefore becomes the next POTUS.  He did this in 2016 and I think he has a good chance of doing it in 2024 based on where we are today.  But even if he does not win the electoral college he will still be awarded the Presidency as we will see.  The general strategy here will be "judicial challenge, appeal, delay and deny". 

1. The Republicans have stated that they plan to challenge any state results where they lose. This challenge will be in the form of a lawsuit and if they do not win the lawsuit they will appeal. 

2. Not all of the judges at the Federal level are Republican partisans but a substantial number of them are. At the state level, again its a mixed bag, but many of the judges from Red states are partisan Republicans. These justices have shown that they will rule in the Republican's favor no matter what the evidence or the law might call for.  This happened most recently when Judge Cannon of Florida stalled and then dismissed the case about the classified documents for the most disingenuous reasons.

3. Therefore a certain percentage of election results are likely to be overturned by Republican judges and awarded to Trump.  If a sufficient number of these exist, then the election is thrown to Trump and we are done.  This is the "local", e.g. by state, version of what the SCOTUS did in November 2000 to throw the election.




4. But if for any reason this is not sufficient to throw the election to Trump, in other words they can not get enough electoral votes, then the SCOTUS will step in and rule in Trump's favor and Trump will have won the election.

5. We know this will happen, if necessary, because the SCOTUS has already thrown one election to the Republicans in 2000 even though the Democrat, Al Gore, won the popular vote and was on his way to winning the electoral college when the SCOTUS intervened.

6. We also know the SCOTUS will intervene to put Trump in power because of how they handled the immunity matter.  In that situation they could have declined to hear the issue of presidential immunity because the Appeals court had already considered the issues and written what many people believe to be a reasonable opinion.  Not only did the SCOTUS insist on reconsidering the issue, they delayed doing so until the last possible minute, therefore making it impossible for Trump to be tried for his crimes before the election.  And then they ruled that Trump does have immunity for most crimes that he commits as president.  There is no justification for this ruling.  But there doesnt have to be.  Whatever the theoretical issues may be, practically Trump has been given blanket immunity because there is no time for a trial before the election.

7. Therefore the SCOTUS has proven that it will always intercede in the Republican's favor whenever it can get the opportunity.  And since any disagreeable result in the election will be appealed to the Supreme Court, they will certainly get the opportunity.

As a footnote, of course within moments of becoming nominal president he will instruct his Attorney General to dismiss the charges against him.

Whether or not this is what happens, I propose to you that what has been described here is reasonable given the people and institutions involved.

Therefore, I think it is fair to say that Trump becomes the next President of the United States and you should make your plans accordingly.


Saturday, July 13, 2024

Emigration Notes


[I doubt the following post has much useful information.  I think that almost any country will accept someone and their family temporarily if they have money and is willing to work the system.  You may not be able to be a permanent resident, but the only permanent residents are the dead.  The more money you have the more you can work the system and achieve your will.  Therefore, if you want to live in another country or emigrate, I suggest you get as much money as possible and nothing will be refused you].

The following is a collection of notes I have put together on the topic of moving to another country.  It is sourced from experiences of people I know and things I have read, mostly on the Internet.   I know a few people who have been thinking about moving on.  I personally always romanticized the concept of an ex-patriot community, you know, like Paris Between the Wars.  

But on a less pleasant note, it may be that Trump will win a second term and call out the army if anyone dares to protest der Fuhrer's desires in any way.  If that happens, I really dont want to be here.

I need to emphasize that I am not writing from personal experience.  And I suspect from other things in life that until you do something like this you do not really know what is involved.  

I do have a few general suggestions though, that I hope are completely non-controversial.  First, if you have never lived in the target country,  consider visiting that country for 12 weeks or so on a tourist visa and see how you like it.  Second, be leery of things you read on the internet (like this post) because it is very likely you may be reading information that is incomplete or out-of-date.  Third, start the process now because if your experience is like many other people's experience, it will take a long time.

This is in no particular order.

First, archaeologists and prehistorians argue endlessly about how much migration has existed in human history.  Some say a lot, some say very little.  But what is undeniable is that migration has been a part of the known history of the world since we started keeping records and writing things down.  

Second, You will find Internet web sites that imply that it is easy to move to another country.  As far as I can tell, this is obvious nonsense (at least in the general case).  Alternatively, you will find other internet web sites (or friends in the target countries) who will tell you that it is impossible to move to their country, even though we all know people who have done it.  There is some weird psychology here.

A good example of a website with probably helpful information is: https://www.globalcitizensolutions.com/easiest-countries-to-immigrate-to/

You may choose to emigrate through the front door.  But many people I know have used one of the standard exceptions.  Although the rules will change per country, most countries do seem to have some sort of allowance for each of these.  There are three general classes of exception that I am aware of: the marriage exception, the employment exception, and the student/teacher exception.  First, it seems that if you marry a citizen of another country, in general that country will make allowances for you to move there to live with your spouse.  So there you are, no problem!  Just get married.

Second, if you can get a company in another country to want to hire you, and they can get the necessary paperwork done, then that other country will make allowances for you to move there to work.   This opportunity comes and goes, it is very situational, and there are always limits.  But there was a time when people with certain technical skills involving computers and visual effects were permitted to spend years in Canada, the UK, New Zealand and so forth working at very reasonable salaries.  Most of those countries will have a program where, after a certain number of years, you and your family can be naturalized as a citizen.  However, you have to act on this when it happens because this sort of situation and program comes and goes.  Finally, it seems that most countries will make provisions for people to come to study in their country if you can get accepted at an accredited institution.  A variation on that is to be a professor that a university wants to bring over to teach.  

Other than the marriage exception, none of these other approaches guarantee you the right to be a resident or citizen in the long run.  There may be a path to citizenship but there may not be and it always involves work.

Fourth, there are a number of special exceptions to the front door on a country by country basis.  Italy will make allowances for a certain subset of descendants of those who left Italy to apply for and get Italian citizenship.  I know someone who has done this and it wasnt easy and it took him years.  The country of Israel will make allowances for a Jew to return to Israel.  The issue of how a Jew is defined is non trivial in some cases but in most cases it is straightforward.   There are some European countries that have made allowances for Jews who survived the Holocaust to apply for and get citizen ship.  Again, it isnt easy.  Other countries will "do it for the money".  They will let you move there if you make a 500K or whatever investment and there are probably some other rules.  Recently there has been a special "entrepreneurial exception" in some countries, such as the Netherlands.  In this situation, if you are willing to come to the Netherlands and start a new company in a trendy area, they will provide the visas for you to do so.

Another approach which is straightforward and often used is to simply go to that country as a tourist, and return to this country when the time limit is reached.  There are lots of variations on this approach but I have had friends who have lived in Mexico for years on a tourist visa who every six months or so have to come back to the USA to get their visa renewed.  The European Union will let you do this, but you can only spend 3 months out of every year in any EU country but these rules change and need to be verified.

But if you do not qualify for an exception, and do not want to try anything temporary, then you may want to try the front door.  Those countries are looking for people who are going to bring something to their country and not be a burden on their system.  It will be helpful to speak the language. It will be helpful if you are not there to take a job from another person, but bring some unique skills.  An advanced degree is often helpful as is a specific, desirable skill, such as being a medical doctor.  You should not have a criminal record, obviously.  And people do this kind of immigration every day of the week.  But it will probably take a long time, you may very well need an immigration specialist (aka attorney) in the destination country.  It would be helpful to have a high tolerance for bureaucracy.

You should not be surprised if what you read on the internet turns out not to be true, or is incomplete, or was true once, but not really anymore.  That said, I know people who are not particularly rich who have emigrated to a country that is supposed to be difficult to go to, like New Zealand, and boom.  There they are.  Done.  

Remember, the rules matter, they are country specific, they will change over time, and you will probably need a specialist who will need to get paid to help you.  You must have a high tolerance for bureaucracies because you are very likely to need to deal with one in the target country to do this.

One final thing.  If you are thinking of doing this, dont wait for Trump to be president and call out the army.  First come will be first served, avoid the rush.  In these situations, as in so many others in our world, money and knowing people helps.

Addendum 7/15/2024

-- It seems to take 5 years for someone to get a residency visa for the USA to come here to work.  There are some out of pocket costs as well, they are not zero nor are they huge.   

-- It seems that many countries will now permit a visa for a year or so, maybe longer, based on the individual of another country wanting to do remote work.  This is new, it may not turn into permanent residency, but if you have work you can do remotely, it might enable you to spend a year or more in Spain or Croatia or Malta.


Tuesday, July 9, 2024

Is the NY Times is a Right Wing Front Organization?


The NY Times is running a partisan campaign to attack Joe Biden and destroy the Democrats by creating the fiction that Joe Biden is too old to run.  Aside from being ageist, who gave the NY Times the right to decide who the Democrats will nominate to run for election?  They run their front page articles every damn day, an editorial masquerading as a news article.   

They run this same article, with small variations, every day.  

And of course the NY Times could not care less about reporting on Trump's 34 felony convictions, about how he is unqualified and dangerous as president, about how he will murder Ukraine, about how he has always been corrupt all these years in NY, about his racism, his sexism, his abuse of women.  No.  None of these things matter to the NY Times.  Nor does the NY Times care to report on the illegitimacy of the legal system which is failing to try Donald Trump for his crimes during the January 6 attack on our government.  Nor does the NY Times care one bit about the delays of the case in Florida.  Nor does the NY Times care about women bleeding out from miscarriages that the doctors and hospitals will not treat in a Red State.

I remember when SCOTUS threw the 2000 election to their right wing nut, W. Bush, which caused a trillion dollar war in Iraq and put Alito and Roberts on the Supreme Court.   Not one word of protest from this right-wing rag.  From the day the SCOTUS pissed on the constitution in public, not one word was said about the illegitimacy of the W. Bush administration, its wars, or its judiciary.

There are several mysteries here.  Why do people continue to think and to say that the NY Times is in some way a bastion of progressive thought, the primary outlet for the so called "liberal media"?  That is as obviously false as saying that the Jews control the media, a joke if I ever heard one.  The second mystery is why are they doing this?  Who is telling them to do this?  Well one obvious suspect is that it is the elites of Wall Street and possibly just the elites who run our government, or think they do.  I have heard that Wall Street is all in support of Trump, just like Silicon Valley hates Biden for daring to talk about regulating AI.  

I dont think I know why the NY Times wants to destroy Biden.  I am certainly cancelling my subscription and I am sure the NY Times will not care that I do so, not even a little bit.



A Midjourney impression of unused newspaper printing machinery

Wednesday, July 3, 2024

The Sh*t is Getting Worse

At least one good friend thinks I am being too harsh on our elected representatives.  We will never agree on this.  The time for the Democrats to stand up for our rights was November 2000, yet I had many Democratic friends at the time who thought I was overdramatizing the problem.  I didnt think so then, I dont think so now.  


Dear Representative

After two decades or more of going along with the Democrats weak support of democracy, we reach a crisis.   This has been coming for a long time, at least since November 2000 when the Democrats permitted George Bush to steal the election, thus putting Roberts & Alito on the supreme court.  That was a critical mistake, but it was not the only one.  You had opportunity after opportunity to fix the supreme court, to make a stand, to get Merrick Garland on the court, for example, but you failed.  And so as the Republicans merrily put their right wing nuts throughout the judiciary, you continued to play golf or whatever it is you do.  As globalization and elite immigration destroyed employment for people like me, you just laughed.  And the supreme court destroyed the voting rights act.  And the supreme court put Citizens United in place.  And so forth and so on.  You ignored the traditional working class of the Democratic party, you did nothing for the "flyover states".  Nothing.  As far as I can tell you guys are a total failure.

So here we are, and now what do we do.




The only input we are permitted to have is through our "elected" representatives, who may or may not actually be elected (see voting rights act comment above and dont forget the November 2000 coup d'etat).  But our representatives have not done their job, nor do they particularly care to do their job, and issues and problems that might have been solved when they were small have now become very large and very difficult. In fact it is unlikely that they can be solved with the normal tools at hand.   That is too bad for all of us.

Therefore it is up to us to make our opinions known to our representatives even if it makes their lives just a little bit uncomfortable.  We tried it the other way.   All we can do is call you and be as insistent as possible until you do what you should have done already or we vote you out of office.

I am sure that the following demands will be difficult, maybe impossible. But failure will mean that we dont vote for you, and maybe vote for your opponent.  Then when he or she also fails, we vote for their opponent.  And so on and so forth.  At some point people will lose patience and civil society will be at an end.  That time may have already come to pass.  Again, too bad you guys screwed up.

This is a pretty strong set of opinions I am presenting here.  We do have a right to our opinion, dont we?  Maybe? 

So here is what we require from our so-called elected representatives.

1. Donald Trump is tried for his crimes before the election.  That means the Jan 6 events and the theft and handling of classified materials.  Given how close it is to the election, that means the trials start now.  At the very least, Judge Cannon needs to be removed.

2. The Supreme Court must reverse its ludicrous decisions or some workaround needs to be found.

3. The Supreme Court needs to be fixed.  That may mean term limits, it may mean impeachment, it may mean increasing the size of the court, it may mean something else.

4. The other courts need to be fixed.  Trump and others have put right wing nuts into the judiciary at all levels, they have to be removed.  Right now.

5. The supreme court must be open to public opinion, unlike the way it is now.  

6. The Voting Rights Act needs to be restored.  Citizen's United needs to be removed.  

We need all of these and we need them now.  So sorry you screwed up, maybe you will do a better job going forward.  Or maybe your replacements will.  I am not sure what will happen when you fail as you almost certainly will.

Sincerely,
MW





Tuesday, July 2, 2024

Representatives Playing Golf

I have called my two representatives (current and former) and my two senators to express my opinion about the failure of my representatives to see that Donald Trump is tried before the election and to reverse the ridiculous decisions of our right wing nutty boy so called supreme court.   I have also asked them to see to it that we can express our opinion to the supreme court. 
 
Repesentative Cardenas
Representative Carbajal
Senator Laphonza Butler 310 914 7300
Senator Alex Padilla. 310 231 4494








The Supreme Court Doesnt Take Comments

You are not permitted to give comments to the supreme court of the united states.  They couldnt care less.  If you call them, they will tell you this once and then hang up.  If you try to call again you are blocked.  We live in a right wing dictatorship.

But my elected representative did give me a phone number where I could leave a message.  Maybe.  Try 202 479 3000 and 202 479-3060.




Friday, June 28, 2024

Possible Solution to Supreme Court Ruling to Destroy the Homeless


Since the Supreme Court believes that we should destroy the homeless by denying them anywhere to go, but the Court also believes that it is unconstitutional to do anything to regulate firearms, why not put the two policies together and give AR-15s to the homeless and allow them to defend themselves?


Image by MidJourney

Good Background Material on Mandatory Palestine


I refuse to discuss the issues in Mandatory Palestine with most people.  What would be the point?  They know even less than I do, apparently, and that is saying something.  So rather than waste your time with my opinions on most of the issues, instead I will mention a few articles or books that I found particularly helpful.  

First "A Peace to End All Peace" by David Fromkin about the end of the Ottoman Empire. See https://www.amazon.com/Peace-End-All-Ottoman-Creation/dp/0805068848

Second,  "Should American Jews Abandon Elite Universities?" by Bret Stephens in the NY Times.  See https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/opinion/jews-ivy-league-antisemitism.html

Students who police words like “blacklist” or “whitewash” and see “microaggressions” in everyday life ignore the entreaties of their Jewish peers to avoid chants like “globalize the intifada” or “from the river to the sea.” Students who claim they’re horribly pained by scenes of Palestinian suffering were largely silent on Oct. 7 — when they weren’t openly cheering the attacks. And students who team up with outside groups that are in overt sympathy with Islamist terrorists aren’t innocents. They’re collaborators.

Third, an article on the history of Zionism, particularly in the context of other ideologies of the 19th century by Peretz. See https://zionism-israel.com/ezine/Zionism_God_History.htm

I believe that there is something to be said for moral authority.  In other words, before you lecture other people or nations, it would be best if one cleaned up one's own house first.  Sometimes this is stated as "Let he (or she) who is without sin throw the first stone." or "leading by example".  If an American wants another nation which is fighting for its survival to "return the occupied territories" perhaps they should start by returning their own "occupied territories".  For example, in the case of the United States of America, one might return the states of New York, California or Virginia, all of them occupied territories. 

Peace.


Ensign of the Palestinian Mandate


Friday, June 21, 2024

Notes on Adding Assets to the OpenSpace Project (OSP)


There is an open source project to provide a visualization framework to present astronomical data to the public called, logically enough, the OpenSpace Project (OSP).  It is in the grand tradition of the infrastructure of planetariums that stretches back in time to long before computer graphics and even computers.  The current state of the art uses graphics and projection hardware that would have been far too expensive for this purpose even a few years ago.

This particular framework seems to be a robust, somewhat comprehensive collection of the things one might need to put on a science show at a planetarium.  Time marches on, and so must the software.  It must permit new science to be incorporated into the core framework.

Furthermore,   the classic planetarium show has always been interactive and real time even when it has been rigorously scripted. Real time enables improvisation but it does not require it.   Every community has its traditions and the traditions of planetarium shows insist on this capability.

One of the principals of this project, Carter Emmart, a veteran of the ancient Digital Galaxy Project at the Hayden in NYC, asked me to add a very simple item to the repertoire of OpenSpace.  It should have been straightforward, but I have been pulling my hair out trying to get traction because, as we all know, writing documentation for a complicated piece of software like OpenSpace is non-trivial and not particularly pleasant.  OpenSpace does have documentation but not all documentation fits all use cases.

Systems of this type have very different classes of users and they all need different learning materials.  Some of these users will script new shows with the capabilities at hand.  Others will want to add to the functionality of the software.  Still others will be doing a masters or PhD thesis that incorporates visualization of science data or models into the software, but for their own use and not as a general capability.  Some of these people will be astrophysicists, some will be visualizers and some will be children.  So learning the software is likely to be painful depending on what your use case is.

This blog post will attempt to fill in some of these gaps for those who come after me.  The post will evolve as my understanding evolves.

The task at hand is to be able to create a type of lunar surface that exhibits the "retro reflection effect" for want of a better term.  Imagine you are in a lunar rover on the surface of the moon.  One of the observed phenomena is for light to be directed back at its source just as you might see from a reflected sign on a highway at night.  This phenomenon has been observed both on the moon and from earth.  It shouldnt be too hard to have OpenSpace simulate some version of this.





Notes for Adding New Geometry & Shader to OpenSpace


1. In general, types of data to be visualized with the OpenSpace Project (OSP) are defined as assets.  All assets are defined in text files with the suffix ".asset".

2. Assets can be added statically at the startup of OSP or interactively through the Lua console.  

3. The particular type of asset we want to add is called a RenderableModel.  See the documentation for this kind of asset at 


4. There are three fields in particular that interest us: the GeometryFile, the VertexShader and the Fragment Shader.

5. The GeometryFile will be the filename of a GLTF or GLB file.  This filetype is designed to encapsulate 3D geometry and many other things.  It is documented and maintained by Khronos and can be read about here:


6. The Vertex and Fragment shaders are individual text files which are compiled and downloaded to the relevant GPUs.  They contain the code necessary to actually render the surface in real time.  

7. Probably we will define this type of asset interactively using Lua, and therefore will need the scripting API documentation, which is documented here:


8. So, to my current understanding, I will be creating a new type of asset which points to some geometry, a vertex shader, and a fragment shader, and add this asset interactively via Lua.

No doubt this post will be updated as I learn more.