One of the most traditional
phenomenonological questions is how do I know that what you see is
the same thing as what I see. If we both look at a picture, and it
has the color red, and we both agree it is red, even so, how do I
know that the red that you perceive is the same red as I perceive?
The answer is, you don't know. There
is natural variation in the red and green cone sensitivities at the
very least, and there are other issues involving how the brain
processes the information. And of course there are the various
types of color blindness and the tests that have been designed to
diagnose them.
This post is about an example of an
optical illusion that I see, but that no one else that I have tested
it on sees. One reason for posting it on the blog is to
see if one of my readers will also see the illusion. So far, I seem to be a "unique".
Those of you who know about the
perception of illusions may skip the next few paragraphs.
For those of you who have never studied
the perception of illusions, here are a few things to know.
Although we "see" with our eyes, what we see is perceived
by our brain, and there is a lot of interesting circuitry in there to
process and make sense of the data. This is also an ongoing research topic. If you have never studied
issues of color perception and optical illusions, when you first
encounter what we think we know about it, you will be surprised. It
is pretty wacky. We are very good at detecting color differences
for example, more than the precise color itself. We have lots of
circuitry to see movement on the periphery. The point is, seeing
is much more than just reporting what may be "objectively
there" through the lens of our eye. It is being highly
processed all along the way.
But be warned, once you start down the path of understanding color perception and vision you will find that it goes on and on and on. And then on and on. Its not simple.
Many optical illusions are essentially bugs in the perception system, that is, the image is causing the perception circuitry to see something that isn't actually there (e.g. motion when there is no motion, colors, when there are no colors, etc).
But be warned, once you start down the path of understanding color perception and vision you will find that it goes on and on and on. And then on and on. Its not simple.
Many optical illusions are essentially bugs in the perception system, that is, the image is causing the perception circuitry to see something that isn't actually there (e.g. motion when there is no motion, colors, when there are no colors, etc).
Here is an example of a famous illusion
that most people are able to see. Its called the Cafe Wall
illusion, because its discoverers first noticed it as an
architectural detail on the facade of a cafe.
All the horizontal lines in the above
image are straight and parallel with each other but most people see the lines at an angle to each other, and also bending depending on where they direct their eyes. Everyone seems to be able to see this illusion.
Now, look at the following blurry
image.
Founders of Google in China from The Register (www.theregister.co.uk)
Most people will see this image as completely flat, e.g. no depth. It is of course a very blurry image. I on the other hand always see a lenticular depth effect of something like 3/8's of an inch.
By "lenticular depth effect"
I mean the illusion of depth one gets from a lenticular picture or
postcard when you hold it in your hand. These were more popular years ago, they would often be post cards of the United Nations, or of Elvis. The postcard would appear to be perhaps an inch thick or even more, but you know, because you are holding it, that is just a piece of cardboard. The same illusion of depth that you get from such a postcard is what I see above, except of course that it does not change as I move my head. It is a picture with depth from one point of view.
I spent a day trying to recreate the illusion with other images, and I think I know what is going on that causes the illusion for me. But I have not yet found anyone else that the illusion works on. One thing I find interesting is that, for me, this is a robust illusion. I see it every time I look at the picture.
I spent a day trying to recreate the illusion with other images, and I think I know what is going on that causes the illusion for me. But I have not yet found anyone else that the illusion works on. One thing I find interesting is that, for me, this is a robust illusion. I see it every time I look at the picture.
Depth perception is notoriously individualistic. There are many people out there who can not see "3D" from stereoscopic projection. I have heard the number is 10% of the general population, but I have never gotten a formal confirmation of that percentage (e.g. a reference to a study). Alternatively, there are people who can see what appears to be stereo in circumstances when they are watching a movie projected flat that moves through an environment. I get that sensation, in particular when the moving imagery covers peripheral vision.
But the first question I have, does
anyone else other than me see depth in this image?
_________________________________
Wikipedia page on the Cafe Wall Illuson
Wikipedia page on Lenticular Printing
Science News article on research into
color perception variation:
The following two abstracts discuss
research in the molecular and genetic basis of variation in color
perception.
Hello, could you tell me where you found your photo of the "Special - K " cafe? I am looking for permission to use the image in a documentary.
ReplyDeleteDear Unknown. I wish I knew. I normally do a google search and then select images, and browse them until or if I find something I like. I vaguely recall that this image came from the people who originally discovered the illusion, and you may find it in or associated with the original paper associated with the cafe illusion. And this may indeed be the cafe that they named the illusion for. Good luck! MW
Delete